ISO 22367 PDF

ISO 22367 PDF

This international standard characterizes the application of ISO as a system for reducing laboratory error and improving patient safety by applying the . ISO Argentina Australia. Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Chile implementation of ISO ; ISO/TS Medical laboratories–. ISO/TS Medical laboratories – Reduction of error through risk management and continual improvement. • CLSI EPA. Laboratory QC Based on.

Author: Tezshura Bragul
Country: French Guiana
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 1 August 2014
Pages: 410
PDF File Size: 14.65 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.77 Mb
ISBN: 791-6-77574-540-8
Downloads: 89899
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulkizilkree

As an example, monoclonal proteins may affect many laboratory measurements, including glucose, bilirubin, C-reactive protein, creatinine and albumin. Accredited medical laboratories, however, are now forced to implement risk management principles. Clin Chem Lab Med ; The reduction of RPN after three months from implementation of corrective actions showed their effectiveness summed to that of the entire risk management process, although FMEA remains a technique especially useful for evaluating a new process prior to its implementation and not for process monitoring.

The list of Qls is available on line at www.

Detection, identification 22376 monitoring of errors through a set of harmonized, evidence-based and patient-centred QIs, are effective tools for risk assessment. This model is divided into process and outcome measures, mainly based on measures of the pre- intra-and post-analytical procedures and processes, and has been revised in a Consensus Conference organized to establish a list of Qls that should be evidence-based, feasible for most laboratories around the world and actionable National Academies Press US ; Frequency of failure to inform patient of clinically significant outpatient test results.


In addition, advances in information technology, quality control and quality assurance methods have made a valuable contribution to error reduction. This, in turn, is the main driver for the increasing awareness and concern regarding the need of standardization and harmonization projects in laboratory medicine Overall, data reported demonstrate that the initial and final steps of the TTP process, above all test requesting and reaction to laboratory results, are not only more error-prone than all the other steps, but are also the most important causes of potential adverse outcomes for patients.

As revealed in a systematic review of the literature, failure to follow-up test results markedly compromises patient safety, yet the rate of abnormal laboratory results for INR and PSA without follow-up ranges from 6.


isp The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Patient safety is defined as the absence of avoidable patient harm due to adverse events occurring in any process of medical attention. Many models have been developed over the past decades to help medical laboratories improving quality certification and accreditation models, six sigma tool and enhancing safety FMEA, hazard and operability studies, probabilistic risk assessment 6since complex and mature organizations are now asked to continuously monitor their processes for preventing that actual observed failures can be repeated.

The CCLM contribution to improvements in quality and patient safety.

ISO/DIS – Medical laboratories — Application of risk management to medical laboratories

Laboratory errors and risk management From a risk management viewpoint, the great majority of laboratory errors have little direct impact on patient care but provide important learning opportunities. During the past decade, after the publication of the Institute of Medicine IOM report, To Err Is Human 1patient safety has isso become the object of medical and public attention.

Harmonization in laboratory medicine: The overall rate of failure to inform the patient or to record communication of information was 7. Missed hypothyroidism diagnosis uncovered by linking laboratory and pharmacy data.

An empirical equation links with an inverse relationship the severity of an event and its 22376 probability, so that frequent events with a low level of severity are potentially high-risk events, whilst isolated events with high level of severity are very high-risk events. Please review our privacy policy. Once identified, potential either actual failures, their risk must be estimated.

In fact, any error, regardless of its apparently trivial nature, might indicate weaknesses in policies and procedures that may not lead to adverse events in their particular context, but might cause the patient harm in slightly different circumstances Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: Medical laboratories – reduction of error through risk management and continual improvement.

The evidence on the importance of and direct link between diagnostic errors and errors in laboratory medicine derives from a series of studies with a clinical starting point. Clin Chem ; According to ISO Two main aspects contribute to this consideration.


Patient safety and risk management in medical laboratories: theory and practical application

Errors, mistakes, blunders, outliers, or unacceptable results: The use of a consensually-defined list of evidence-based Qls to be applied in the accreditation programs of clinical laboratories according to the current International Standard ISO For each QIs, the system automatically multiplies the three variables: Consider the opportunities for applying risk management to pre-analytic and post-analytic processes.

In addition, according to this Technical Specification 15any clinical laboratory should employ processes for: While the frequency of laboratory errors varies greatly, depending on the study design and steps of the total testing process TTP investigated, a series of papers published in the last two decades drew the attention of laboratory professionals to the pre- and post-analytical phases, which currently appear to be more vulnerable to errors than the analytical phase.

Pending laboratory tests and the hospital discharge summary in patients discharged to sub-acute care.

Laboratory staff should hence lower the actual failures to an acceptable level, but should be aware and ready to avoid potentially serious risks but less frequent that could be masked. Evidence-based quality indicators represent a formidable tool for improving quality and decreasing the risk of errors in the total testing process. It appears no longer in corrective actions but in preventive actions 4.

Am Iwo Clin Pathol ; Quality in healthcare appears as strictly connected to risk management principles. RPN or risk code allows then to distinguishing high from low risk processes, so prioritizing interventions. Partners in reducing diagnostic error related to laboratory testing.

Course Syllabus Course Lesson. CLSI guidelines and ISO standards strongly advocate that the medical laboratory implement Risk Management as a way to assure quality in their testing processes.